š§¾ Karen Read Case: Charge-Specific Credibility & Verdict Trend Analysis
- Cassian Creed
- Jun 3, 2025
- 2 min read
Writer: Cassian CreedUpdated: June 3, 2025(Trend Tracking: May 30 ā June 2 ā June 3)
āļø Charge Breakdown & Updated GUILT-X Matrix
1ļøā£ Second-Degree Murder
Factor | May 30 | June 2 | June 3 | Ī (2ā3) | Interpretation |
š Vehicle Evidence | 28% | 25.75% | 24.5% | š½ -1.25 | Barros testimony undermines taillight chain of custody |
š± Timeline Credibility | 35% | 35% | 35% | āŗļø 0 | No changes in SD card or phone sync data |
š¤ McCabe Testimony Credibility | 28% | 20.5% | 20.5% | āŗļø 0 | No new shift on early tab issue |
šµļø Investigator Integrity | 31.25% | 20% | 18.25% | š½ -1.75 | Diamandis texts confirm deeper bias by Proctor |
āļø Verdict Probability | 8% | 8% | 7% | š½ -1.0 | Credibility deterioration compounds doubt |
2ļøā£ Manslaughter While Operating Under the Influence (OUI)
Factor | May 30 | June 2 | June 3 | Ī (2ā3) | Interpretation |
š§Ŗ Tox Evidence Absent | N/A | N/A | N/A | āŗļø 0 | No OUI confirmation from scene or toxicology |
š Vehicle Maneuver Data | 47% | 47% | 47% | āŗļø 0 | Still circumstantial; no direct intoxication link |
šµļø Investigation Bias | 31.25% | 20% | 18.25% | š½ -1.75 | Proctor texts & Russell bias implications persist |
āļø Verdict Probability | 8% | 8% | 8% | āŗļø 0 | No change, still weak on causality element |
3ļøā£ Leaving the Scene of Personal Injury/Death
Factor | May 30 | June 2 | June 3 | Ī (2ā3) | Interpretation |
š± Digital Forensic Timing | 35% | 35% | 35% | āŗļø 0 | No new digital evidence introduced |
š Scene Authenticity | 22% | 22% | 21.5% | š½ -0.5 | Dog bite testimony supports alternative injury theory |
šµļø Scene Handling Integrity | 31.25% | 20% | 18.25% | š½ -1.75 | Barros & Russell further highlight evidence issues |
āļø Verdict Probability | 8% | 8% | 7% | š½ -1.0 | Doubts on intent-to-flee and scene clarity increase |
š Verdict-X Outcome Forecast (Updated)
Verdict Outcome | May 30 | June 2 | June 3 | Ī (2ā3) | Trend Summary |
š¢ Full Acquittal | 54% | 54% | 56% | š¼ +2 | Trend reinforced by defense testimony and prosecution erosion |
š” Hung Jury | 38% | 38% | 37% | š½ -1 | More jurors now have clarity to lean toward acquittal |
š“ Full Conviction | 8% | 8% | 7% | š½ -1 | Prosecution's burden now even harder to meet without new evidence |
š Updated Summary (May 30 ā June 3)
Credibility Changes (GUILT-X):
š½ Vehicle evidence credibility now down to 24.5%
š½ Investigator integrity credibility drops again (18.25%)
š½ Scene authenticity weakened by Russellās dog-bite analysis
āŗļø Timeline, McCabe, and altercation theory stable
Verdict Impact (VERDICT-X):
š¢ Acquittal now the most statistically supported path (56%)
š” Hung jury marginally less likely (37%)
š“ Full conviction now extremely remote (7%)
š§ Cassian Creed Final Interpretation:
āAs of June 3, the prosecution is not just losing narrative groundāitās structurally collapsing. With key witnesses either discredited or absent, the mathematical weight of reasonable doubt now clearly favors acquittal on all charges.ā





Comments