top of page
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

🧾 Karen Read Case: Charge-Specific Credibility & Verdict Trend Analysis

  • Writer: Cassian Creed
    Cassian Creed
  • Jun 3
  • 2 min read

Writer: Cassian CreedUpdated: June 3, 2025(Trend Tracking: May 30 → June 2 → June 3)

āš–ļø Charge Breakdown & Updated GUILT-X Matrix

1ļøāƒ£ Second-Degree Murder

Factor

May 30

June 2

June 3

Ī” (2→3)

Interpretation

šŸš— Vehicle Evidence

28%

25.75%

24.5%

šŸ”½ -1.25

Barros testimony undermines taillight chain of custody

šŸ“± Timeline Credibility

35%

35%

35%

āŗļø 0

No changes in SD card or phone sync data

šŸ‘¤ McCabe Testimony Credibility

28%

20.5%

20.5%

āŗļø 0

No new shift on early tab issue

šŸ•µļø Investigator Integrity

31.25%

20%

18.25%

šŸ”½ -1.75

Diamandis texts confirm deeper bias by Proctor

āš–ļø Verdict Probability

8%

8%

7%

šŸ”½ -1.0

Credibility deterioration compounds doubt

2ļøāƒ£ Manslaughter While Operating Under the Influence (OUI)

Factor

May 30

June 2

June 3

Ī” (2→3)

Interpretation

🧪 Tox Evidence Absent

N/A

N/A

N/A

āŗļø 0

No OUI confirmation from scene or toxicology

šŸš— Vehicle Maneuver Data

47%

47%

47%

āŗļø 0

Still circumstantial; no direct intoxication link

šŸ•µļø Investigation Bias

31.25%

20%

18.25%

šŸ”½ -1.75

Proctor texts & Russell bias implications persist

āš–ļø Verdict Probability

8%

8%

8%

āŗļø 0

No change, still weak on causality element

3ļøāƒ£ Leaving the Scene of Personal Injury/Death

Factor

May 30

June 2

June 3

Ī” (2→3)

Interpretation

šŸ“± Digital Forensic Timing

35%

35%

35%

āŗļø 0

No new digital evidence introduced

šŸ“Œ Scene Authenticity

22%

22%

21.5%

šŸ”½ -0.5

Dog bite testimony supports alternative injury theory

šŸ•µļø Scene Handling Integrity

31.25%

20%

18.25%

šŸ”½ -1.75

Barros & Russell further highlight evidence issues

āš–ļø Verdict Probability

8%

8%

7%

šŸ”½ -1.0

Doubts on intent-to-flee and scene clarity increase

šŸ“Š Verdict-X Outcome Forecast (Updated)

Verdict Outcome

May 30

June 2

June 3

Ī” (2→3)

Trend Summary

🟢 Full Acquittal

54%

54%

56%

šŸ”¼ +2

Trend reinforced by defense testimony and prosecution erosion

🟔 Hung Jury

38%

38%

37%

šŸ”½ -1

More jurors now have clarity to lean toward acquittal

šŸ”“ Full Conviction

8%

8%

7%

šŸ”½ -1

Prosecution's burden now even harder to meet without new evidence

šŸ” Updated Summary (May 30 → June 3)

Credibility Changes (GUILT-X):

  • šŸ”½ Vehicle evidence credibility now down to 24.5%

  • šŸ”½ Investigator integrity credibility drops again (18.25%)

  • šŸ”½ Scene authenticity weakened by Russell’s dog-bite analysis

  • āŗļø Timeline, McCabe, and altercation theory stable

Verdict Impact (VERDICT-X):

  • 🟢 Acquittal now the most statistically supported path (56%)

  • 🟔 Hung jury marginally less likely (37%)

  • šŸ”“ Full conviction now extremely remote (7%)

🧠 Cassian Creed Final Interpretation:

ā€œAs of June 3, the prosecution is not just losing narrative ground—it’s structurally collapsing. With key witnesses either discredited or absent, the mathematical weight of reasonable doubt now clearly favors acquittal on all charges.ā€

Ā 
Ā 
Ā 

Recent Posts

See All
Top True Crime Stories That Captivate

True crime stories have long fascinated audiences worldwide. Their blend of mystery, psychology, and real-world consequences creates a compelling narrative that keeps readers and viewers hooked. This

Ā 
Ā 
Ā 

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating

© 2025 by Cassian Creed

. Powered and secured by Wix

bottom of page