Karen Read FaQ's (Updated June 9th)

• What are the main charges against Karen Read? Karen Read is facing charges of second-degree murder, manslaughter while operating under the influence, and leaving the scene of a crash resulting in death in connection with the death of her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe. The prosecution alleges she struck him with her SUV during a blizzard and left him to die.

• Why was a mistrial declared in the first trial? The first trial ended in a mistrial because the jury was deadlocked and unable to reach a unanimous verdict. They informed Judge Beverly J. Cannone multiple times that they were deeply divided.

• What is a key point of contention regarding the evidence in the second trial? A significant point of contention in the second trial revolves around the damage to John O'Keefe's sweatshirt. The defense argues that holes in the back of the sweatshirt were created by a criminalist during laboratory testing and were not present when police collected the evidence. This became a point of conflict when the special prosecutor showed the sweatshirt with these holes to a defense expert witness, leading to a motion for a mistrial.

• What is the defense's alternative theory about O'Keefe's death? The defense team maintains that Karen Read is innocent and is the victim of a vast police conspiracy. Their theory is that John O'Keefe was fatally beaten by another law enforcement officer at a house party and his body was later placed outside. This theory suggests a cover-up involving multiple individuals, including law enforcement and first responders.

• What is the significance of the "ho[w] long to die in cold" Google search? A Google search performed by Jennifer McCabe for "ho[w] long to die in cold" is a crucial piece of evidence in the case. The prosecution sought to exclude testimony from a defense expert regarding this search, suggesting its potential importance to the narrative of the events surrounding O'Keefe's death. The defense has argued this search is troubling and creates doubt about the prosecution's theory.

• What role have expert witnesses played in the trial? Expert witnesses, particularly those specializing in crash reconstruction and forensic analysis, are playing a significant role in the trial. Both the prosecution and defense have presented experts whose testimonies often conflict. The defense aims to use their experts to challenge the prosecution's narrative and sow reasonable doubt, while the prosecution questions the methods and conclusions of the defense's experts. The credibility of these experts and the jury's interpretation of their testimony are seen as potentially determining the outcome.

• How has the presence of Karen Read's supporters outside the courthouse impacted the proceedings? Karen Read's supporters have been present outside the courthouse throughout the trials. Initially, Judge Cannone implemented a buffer zone to prevent potential disruption and influence on the jury. However, this buffer zone was later lifted, allowing supporters to be closer, although they are still expected to conduct themselves in a way that doesn't interfere with the trial or intimidate jurors. This public support is seen by some as a "prove phenomenon" fueled by aspects of the case, such as text messages from a state trooper involved in the investigation.

• What is the prosecution's strategy in the second trial, according to legal analysis? According to legal analysis, the prosecution, led by special prosecutor Hank Brennan, has adopted a different strategy in the second trial compared to the first. Instead of presenting evidence chronologically, Brennan is described as using a more fragmented approach, presenting "little crumbs" of information from various witnesses to build the case. This method is suggested to potentially help the jury retain information and understand the importance of different pieces of evidence later in the trial.

convert_to_textConvert to source