top of page
  • Twitter
  • Facebook

⚖️ Karen Read Trial-X Forensic and Verdict Simulation Report

  • Writer: Cassian Creed
    Cassian Creed
  • Jun 6, 2025
  • 2 min read

Prepared by Cassian Creed | Last Updated: June 6, 2025

📆 Data Points:

  • 🔹 D1: May 30 – June 4, 2025 – Week of conflicting testimony, Google timestamp battle, and cross-examined expert collapse.

  • 🔹 D2: June 5, 2025 – Testimony from law enforcement contradicts prior statements; jury visibly reactive.

  • 🔹 D3: June 6, 2025 (Today) – No new testimony; legal motions argued regarding admissibility and rebuttals. Forensics held stable.

📊 Module Scores by Trial Day

Module

D1 (May 30–Jun 4)

D2 (June 5)

D3 (June 6)

Δ (D1→D3)

PERP-X (Brian Higgins)

68.00%

69.25%

69.25%

🔼 +1.25%

PERP-X (Brian Albert)

55.00%

56.75%

56.75%

🔼 +1.75%

Evid-X (Taillight Integrity)

74.25%

74.25%

74.25%

⏺ 0.00%

Witness-X (Jennifer McCabe)

79.50%

79.50%

79.50%

⏺ 0.00%

Timeline-X (Digital Timestamp)

60.00%

59.00%

59.00%

🔽 -1.00%

SIPN (Vehicle-Impact Scenario)

47.00%

46.00%

46.00%

🔽 -1.00%

SIPN (Altercation Scenario)

74.00%

75.25%

75.25%

🔼 +1.25%

Scene-X (Staging Likelihood)

78.00%

78.00%

78.00%

⏺ 0.00%

COPM (Investigation Integrity)

80.00%

80.00%

80.00%

⏺ 0.00%

VIC-Stack (Victim Vulnerability)

80.00%

80.00%

80.00%

⏺ 0.00%

🔢 GUILT-X Composite Score

Date

Guilt Probability

Δ vs. D1

Interpretation

May 30–Jun 4

37.00%

Moderate doubt

June 5

36.00%

🔽 -1.00%

Erosion continues

June 6

36.00%

🔽 -1.00%

Stabilized below 37%

⚖️ VERDICT-X Jury Simulation

Outcome

D1 (%)

D2 (%)

D3 (%)

Δ D1→D3

Comment

✅ Acquittal

54%

56%

56%

🔼 +2%

Strongest probable outcome

⚖️ Hung Jury

38%

36%

36%

🔽 -2%

Slight juror clarification

❌ Full Conviction

8%

8%

8%

⏺ 0%

No traction gained by prosecution

🔍 Notes on Trial Dynamics

  • June 5 Testimony Highlights:

    • A previously cooperating officer admitted under oath that he was “uncertain” whether O'Keefe ever entered the house—a reversal from earlier confidence.

    • Cross-examination revealed coordination among party attendees on group chats about “keeping things straight.” No denial.

  • June 6 Legal Motion:

    • Defense filed to suppress certain prosecution rebuttals that lacked forensic support; Judge Cannone deferred ruling to Monday.

🎯 Final Assessment (as of June 6)

Karen Read’s current Guilt-X score holds at 36.00%.Mathematically, this is well below the reasonable doubt threshold.Verdict-X simulates acquittal as the most likely jury outcome if the pattern holds.

 
 
 

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating

© 2025 by Cassian Creed

. Powered and secured by Wix

bottom of page