Sourced true crime · victim-first
True crime that respects the victims.
Full, primary-source case files for readers who want to understand cases, not consume them. Every victim named in life first — and with each one, what it teaches about keeping the people you love safe.
Get the free guide — we’ll send you How to Read a Case Like the Court Does — a plain-language framework for weighing evidence instead of guessing.
Free forever · unsubscribe anytime · new here? start here →
- Sourced from the public record
- Victims named in life first
- Our A.I. AL forensic lens
- No gore, no filler
What the record can teach us—without blaming the victim.
We do not publish cases as entertainment. When the public record supports a practical lesson, we explain the documented pattern and its limits. No case predicts another, and responsibility always belongs to the person who causes harm.
Why we do this
We tell these stories to help the victims — and never to create new ones by helping send an innocent person to prison or ruin a life. That single rule shapes every case file: presumption of innocence, sources you can check, and people remembered as more than how they died.
Featured case file
Nancy Guthrie Case Update: The Verified Timeline and What Changed
Nancy Guthrie case update with a verified Jan. 31–Aug. 6 timeline, released ransom communications, FBI evidence, reward details, and unresolved questions.
Read the case →
The verified Cassian Creed book
Follow the evidence. Understand the verdict.
Jury Chess: How Criminal Jury Trials Actually Work
A plain-language guide to burdens of proof, evidence rules, objections, jury instructions, deliberations, and the limits of the admitted record. Includes practical “Watch for This” exercises and 212 source notes.
- Separate evidence from argument
- Understand courtroom rulings
- Evaluate forensic claims carefully
Secure checkout · instant PDF download · educational, not legal advice
Every case file separates what the record proves from what is still open — and labels our own reading as analysis, never verdict. Here is the structure behind each one.
Facts tied to the public record: court filings, verdicts, charging documents, and contemporaneous reporting — each one checkable.
Open questions and disputed points are named plainly. We show our confidence honestly instead of dressing a guess as a fact.
A disclosed, human-overseen analytical read of timeline and evidence — built only from public sources. A lens for understanding, never a claim a case was solved.
Sample structure shown for illustration. How our analysis works and its limits →
See the courtroom framework in Jury Chess →Baby Boy Doe — Mansfield, 1985
The Legal Nexus of Postpartum Mental Health
Stalking
Why Arizona and the FBI Are Both Involved in the Nancy Guthrie Case
Nancy Guthrie Ransom Notes
Investigative Case Report
Tupac Shakur Murder Trial Explained
Sara Gilson and Jeremiah Duffey
Irasema Chavez Case
Interactive
Think you could seat a jury?
Question fictional jurors, argue challenges for cause, spend your peremptories — and try not to draw a Batson challenge. Our free Voir Dire Simulator turns jury selection into a five-minute education.
Everyone has an opinion on a case. Here’s how to actually read one.
A charge isn’t a conviction. A theory isn’t proof. Get the free guide — we’ll send How to Read a Case Like the Court Does — a plain-language framework for weighing evidence instead of guessing, the real difference between proof and speculation, and what a verdict actually settles (and what it doesn’t) — plus how each new case’s evidence actually breaks down, using the same framework. No weekly blast; unsubscribe anytime.
Form not loading? Get the free guide →
After you subscribe, the guide arrives by email within a minute — check your inbox (and your spam folder).