Sourced true crime · victim-first
True crime that respects the victims.
Full, primary-source case files for readers who want to understand cases, not consume them. Every victim named in life first — and with each one, what it teaches about keeping the people you love safe.
Get the free guide — we’ll send you How to Read a Case Like the Court Does — a plain-language framework for weighing evidence instead of guessing.
Free forever · unsubscribe anytime · new here? start here →
- Sourced from the public record
- Victims named in life first
- Our A.I. AL forensic lens
- No gore, no filler
No More Victims
We don’t publish these cases for entertainment. We publish them because case after case, the same warning signs repeat — and what repeats can be learned. Every case file ends with what it teaches about keeping the people you love safe.
Why we do this
We tell these stories to help the victims — and never to create new ones by helping send an innocent person to prison or ruin a life. That single rule shapes every case file: presumption of innocence, sources you can check, and people remembered as more than how they died.
Latest case file
The Identification of Cheryl Lynn Edwards: Restoring Identity After 51 Years
After 51 years as Jane Clinton Doe, a 15-year-old homicide victim has her name back. Forensic genetic genealogy restored her identity; the homicide investigation remains active.
Read the case →Every case file separates what the record proves from what is still open — and labels our own reading as analysis, never verdict. Here is the structure behind each one.
Facts tied to the public record: court filings, verdicts, charging documents, and contemporaneous reporting — each one checkable.
Open questions and disputed points are named plainly. We show our confidence honestly instead of dressing a guess as a fact.
A disclosed, human-overseen analytical read of timeline and evidence — built only from public sources. A lens for understanding, never a claim a case was solved.
Sample structure shown for illustration. How our analysis works and its limits →
See the depth in the books →Baby Boy Doe — Mansfield, 1985
Irasema Chavez Case
Jane Hart, 1906–1976
'Not Criminally Responsible' Does Not Mean Walking Free
Colt Gray Hearing
Jane Hart Has Her Name Back
What a Racial Justice Act Violation Means in the Dominguez Retrial
Whose consent travels across borders
Baby Boy Doe Case Update
Interactive
Think you could seat a jury?
Question fictional jurors, argue challenges for cause, spend your peremptories — and try not to draw a Batson challenge. Our free Voir Dire Simulator turns jury selection into a five-minute education.
Everyone has an opinion on a case. Here’s how to actually read one.
A charge isn’t a conviction. A theory isn’t proof. Get the free guide — we’ll send How to Read a Case Like the Court Does — a plain-language framework for weighing evidence instead of guessing, the real difference between proof and speculation, and what a verdict actually settles (and what it doesn’t) — plus how each new case’s evidence actually breaks down, using the same framework. No weekly blast; unsubscribe anytime.
Form not loading? Get the free guide →
After you subscribe, the guide arrives by email within a minute — check your inbox (and your spam folder).